Skip to content
Friday, October 9, 2026
Minor Fashion Journal

Venezuela May Now Shape Trump's Political Legacy - as well as the United States' Place in the World

In the wake of executing a evening of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be getting into the state-building business.

In a striking media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the president declared that US forces had effectively seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a team comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the troubled nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, orderly and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "managing the nation" actually means is uncertain, but the pledge signifies an abrupt shift in direction for the president, laden with contradictions and formidable obstacles.

A leader who campaigned against "endless conflicts", who vehemently denounced past US efforts at regime change and who promised to implement an "America First" foreign policy is now gambling his presidency on successfully revitalizing a South American nation whose economy is collapsed and whose governmental stability has been undermined by decades of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly upbeat.

He claimed his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He pledged to enlist American oil firms to repair Venezuela's deteriorating production infrastructure, supplying financing for the American rebuilding project and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you break it, you own it."

A Changed Global Approach

The US has reshaped Venezuela's future – for better or worse.

Trump came to power nearly a year ago promising to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has shown that he is quite prepared to use armed force around the globe.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted atomic sites in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike previous operations, which have mostly involved missiles and warplanes that reduce the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are strikingly different.

His objective, he said during his press conference, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That twist on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - slogan might prove hard for some of Trump's supporters to swallow.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump ally who broke with the president after accusing him of deserting his core supporters, was quick to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's never ending military aggression and backing for overseas conflicts is understandable because we are compelled to fund it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another notable Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on arms and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to retake confiscated US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the military action against a "criminal regime" as "decisive and legitimate".

Strategic Justifications and Global Implications

During his appearance, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" priorities because it ensured US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American foreign policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will not be challenged again."

The goal of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect commerce, territory and resources that are core to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will provoke broader questions in global politics, however, and affect American ties with the world's other significant global powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement voicing shock and denouncing what it said was a irresponsible assault on a independent country.

During the Biden administration, the US offered comparable censures of Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to mediate a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often seemed to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed worry about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My primary worry is now Russia will use this to justify their illegal and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an invasion of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic critics were more direct.

"The United States should not be running other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have understood by now not to get entangled in endless wars and regime change missions that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a lawbreaker and a dictator with a record of rights violations. But he censured Trump's decision not to inform congressional leaders prior to initiating the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to abide by the law and protect democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his press conference, said that he chose not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "leak" particulars of the operation before the attack.

An Uncertain Future

That mission was a success – with zero American deaths and limited harm to US equipment. Trump, with his characteristic confidence, described the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "among the most astonishing, effective and powerful displays of American military might and proficiency in American history."

Now he is betting his presidency on that success enduring, as the US claims it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that actually means remains unknown. He and his administration must fortify a nation that has been in chaos for decades while calming a region that is sure to be wary of what Trump's foreign policy has in store for them.

About the author

Katelyn Tucker

Lena Visser is a Dutch fashion journalist and editor with a keen eye for emerging styles and subcultures.

Minor Fashion Journal

Type to search articles.